
In a lifetime of loving cricket and its artists, Virat Kohli and Test cricket has been the most compelling love story, and a farewell that feels like bereavement.
Take care of yourself Virat. You’ve meant the world to me.

In a lifetime of loving cricket and its artists, Virat Kohli and Test cricket has been the most compelling love story, and a farewell that feels like bereavement.
Take care of yourself Virat. You’ve meant the world to me.
The regulatory landscape for Indian MSMEs has shifted dramatically with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) Core framework. This framework now requires India’s largest listed companies to report not only on their own Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance but also on the ESG practices of key value chain partners—including MSMEs.1
Scope and Coverage2
The Business Case for MSMEs Going Green
Challenges Hindering MSMEs’ Green Transition3
Despite the clear benefits, MSMEs face significant barriers:
The Numbers4
The Road Ahead: From Compliance to Competitive Advantage
The SEBI BRSR Core mandate is more than a compliance requirement; it’s a catalyst for a fundamental shift in how Indian MSMEs operate. Integrating ESG principles is no longer just about risk mitigation—it’s about unlocking new business opportunities, future-proofing operations, and contributing to India’s global climate commitments.
For MSMEs, the message is clear: Going green is not just good for the planet—it’s now essential for business survival and growth.
Sources
ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. ESG investing evaluates companies on non financial factors covered under any of these three categories. While many issues are multifaceted and may fall under one or more of these headings, the way to differentiate them may lie in separating into the Planet, People, and Profit maxim: E covers all issues that affect the planet, S is for anything affecting humans directly, and G (the most regulated of the three) is for corporate governance issues.
India has a web of laws, regulations, and policies that can be classified as ESG requirements or enablers (now that the acronym ‘ESG’ exists, that is). Here is a run down of some of the most prominent ones (it’s long):
I. Environmental Legal Requirements in India
1. Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
This Act provides a legal framework for the protection of wildlife species and their habitats, including the creation of protected areas such as national parks and wildlife sanctuaries. It prohibits hunting and trade in endangered species, and prescribes penalties for violations. The Act also empowers authorities to regulate activities within protected areas to conserve biodiversity.
2. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
The Water Act is designed to prevent and control water pollution and maintain or restore the wholesomeness of water. Section 16 tasks the Central Pollution Control Board with setting standards for the discharge of pollutants into water bodies, monitoring compliance, and coordinating with state boards. The Act provides for the prosecution of violators and the issuance of directives to polluting entities to cease or modify operations.
3. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
The Forest (Conservation) Act restricts the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes without prior approval from the central government. It aims to curb deforestation and promote sustainable forest management by requiring compensatory afforestation and environmental impact assessments for approved projects. The Act also provides for the protection of forest biodiversity and the rights of forest-dwelling communities.
4. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
This Act establishes a regulatory framework for the prevention, control, and abatement of air pollution in India. Section 17 assigns State Pollution Control Boards the responsibility to set air quality standards, monitor emissions from industrial and vehicular sources, and enforce compliance through permits and penalties. The Act empowers authorities to close or restrict operations of polluting industries and to promote cleaner technologies.
5. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, is India’s primary legislation for the protection and improvement of the environment. Section 3 of the Act empowers the central government to take all necessary measures to protect and improve environmental quality, prevent and control pollution, and set standards for emissions and discharges. Section 6 authorizes the government to make rules for regulating environmental pollution, covering aspects such as waste management, hazardous substances, and the preservation of ecological balance.
6. Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
This Act requires owners handling hazardous substances to take out insurance policies to provide immediate relief to victims of accidents. It ensures that compensation is available for injury, death, or property damage resulting from hazardous activities, regardless of fault. The Act also establishes an Environmental Relief Fund to support compensation payments.
7. Energy Conservation Act 2001 (amended 2022)
The original Energy Conservation Act, 2001 established the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) and set norms for energy efficiency in appliances, buildings, and large energy consumers. The 2022 amendment (which came into effect on 01.01.2023), establishes a legal basis for a carbon market, mandates non-fossil energy use by designated users, expands efficiency standards, and updates building codes.
8. Biological Diversity Act, 2002
The Biological Diversity Act promotes the conservation of India’s biological diversity and the sustainable use of its components. It establishes mechanisms for equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources, and regulates access to biological resources by domestic and foreign entities. The Act is implemented through the National Biodiversity Authority and State Biodiversity Boards.
9. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
The National Green Tribunal Act establishes a specialized tribunal for the expeditious resolution of environmental disputes involving multi-disciplinary issues. The Tribunal has the power to provide relief, compensation, and restitution of damaged environments, and its orders are binding. It aims to ensure effective and speedy environmental justice for affected parties.
10. Policies and Schemes
II. Social Legal Requirements in India
1. Human Rights Laws (Constitutional Provisions)
The Indian Constitution enshrines a broad range of fundamental rights that form the foundation of social legal requirements. Articles 14 to 18 guarantee equality before the law and prohibit discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth, ensuring all citizens are treated fairly. Article 19 protects freedoms such as speech, association, and movement, while Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which courts have interpreted to include the right to livelihood and humane working conditions.
Articles 23 and 24 prohibit trafficking, forced labour, and child labour in hazardous industries, reflecting India’s commitment to protecting vulnerable populations. Article 46, a Directive Principle, directs the State to promote the educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other weaker sections, and to protect them from social injustice and exploitation. These provisions are supported by a range of statutes and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance and redressal.
2. Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, establishes the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Human Rights Commissions to investigate human rights violations and promote awareness. The NHRC has powers to inquire into complaints, intervene in court proceedings, and recommend remedial action to the government.
3. Labour Laws
4. Gender and Social Equity Laws
III. Governance Legal Requirements in India
1. Companies Act, 2013
2. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Requirements (Section 135 and Schedule VII)
Applicability and Committee Formation
Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, mandates that every company, including its holding and subsidiary companies, and certain foreign companies operating in India, must comply with CSR requirements if they meet any one of the following financial criteria during the immediately preceding financial year:
Such companies must constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board, with at least three directors (including one independent director, where applicable). The Committee formulates and recommends a CSR policy, recommends the amount to be spent, and monitors the policy’s implementation.
The 2% CSR Spending Rule
Section 135(5) requires qualifying companies to spend at least 2% of their average net profits made during the three immediately preceding financial years on CSR activities. Net profits are calculated as per Section 198 of the Act. If a company fails to spend the required amount, the Board must specify the reasons in its annual report. Unspent amounts must be transferred to a fund specified in Schedule VII or, for ongoing projects, to a special “Unspent CSR Account” within prescribed timelines, with penalties for default.
Administrative and Reporting Requirements
Administrative overheads for CSR cannot exceed 5% of total CSR expenditure. Any surplus from CSR activities must not form part of business profits and must be reinvested in CSR. Companies must disclose the composition of their CSR Committee and details of CSR activities in the Board’s Report under Section 134(3).
Schedule VII: Eligible CSR Activities
Schedule VII provides an illustrative list of activities for CSR spending, including:
Failure to comply with CSR spending and transfer requirements attracts monetary penalties for both the company and responsible officers.
3. SEBI Regulations (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements—LODR, 2015)
The LODR Regulations, 2015, issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), establish comprehensive requirements for the governance and disclosure practices of listed companies. They mandate board composition standards, including the presence of independent directors and mandatory committees such as audit and nomination committees. The regulations require prompt disclosure of material events, transparent reporting of related party transactions, and maintenance of a functional company website with investor information.
4. Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR, BRSR Core)
5. Anti-Corruption and Money Laundering Laws
If you want me to add anything I’ve missed, please leave a comment about it, and I’ll work on it. Thanks.
References:
A derivative is an asset whose value is based on a different underlying asset. They are called derivatives because they derive their value based on the value of something else. That something else is called the “underlying asset” and can be any asset, such as a stock/ share in a company, land, bags of grain, plant and machinery, inventory, or any other asset, group of assets, or even a benchmark1, or a variable, such as the weather, or an event (outcome of an election). If something has an associated measurement that can be reliably quantified, it can be the “underlying asset”. The underlying asset is also called the “Primary Instrument”.1
If there is any uncertainty about what the value of the underlying will be in the future, whether it is the price of a house, the earnings of a film, or how much rainfall there will be in the month of July next year, there can be a derivative about it. This is because derivatives are based on risk- some parties wish to protect themselves from a particular risk they foresee, and others believe that risk is worth taking. A derivative is a transaction between such risk averse/ risk protective and risk friendly parties.
Why do some people wish to take on more risk while others avoid it? Because humans have different opinions about what will happen in the future, generally believe they are correct about their assessments, and have varying risk appetites. Those with higher risk appetites may think of derivatives either as a wager, or a bet, and those with lower risk appetites may look at them as insurance or hedging against risk.
When thinking of derivatives as wagers or bets, we can liken them to sports betting, and just like organisations that run bets on sports matches have books of odds of what they think the result is likely to be, weather derivatives have an “index” of what is the normal or average or expected weather for a particular geography at a particular time of the year, and how likely it is to be that kind of weather. This is also called speculation- we are speculating on what the associated value measurement of the primary instrument will be at some point in the future, or, we are making a bet or a wager that it will be a particular value, but their value in climate finance lies in the security they provide against weather abnormalities. For example, both less and more rainfall than expected can be negative outcomes for farmers as both can ruin their crop. This sounds like an insurance, except that insurances pay out only when all their conditions are met- derivatives pay out when there is any deviation of the value of the underlying asset from what it was supposed, or expected, to be (the average value).
This is how derivatives can be used instead of insurance, and also why they are often considered better than insurance for those who know how to use them- insurance firms pay out only if there is evidence of a loss, and the loss must be proven to their standards, and even so your entire amount may not be covered due to contractual issues or because they don’t cover certain common types of losses, or even because the insurance company does not consider the evidence you provide to be sufficient. A derivative will pay out immediately as long as there is a difference between what was supposed to happen according to the contract, and what actually happened.
There are two general types of derivatives- firm commitments, and contingent claims. If parties participate in a firm commitment, that is, they promise, they must then fulfill the promise and complete the contract. For contingent claims, you have the option to follow through or not at the time the contract becomes due.
Because the value or price of the primary asset on which the derivative is based can move upwards or downwards, derivatives can also be thought of as being based on the direction of this movement. This is why some contracts are called “long” and some are called “short”:
Long contracts- you will benefit if the value of the underlying asset increases in the future. In case of sports for a match between Teams A and B for Team A to win, you are long (bullish) or you are long on Team A’s chances to win (winning being considered positive, generally).
Short contracts- You will benefit if the value of the underlying asset decreases in the future. In the case of the sports teams, since you are expecting Team A’s victory to take place, you will be short on Team B, because you expect their loss to take place or their value to decrease after the given match.
Example: Let’s say you come to know that Company X will purchase Company Y in the future, you are likely to purchase more shares of Company Y, because usually the purchasee is overvalued by the purchasing company, therefore the price of the shares of Y will increase since X is likely (via historical evidence) to have paid more for Y than Y is actually worth. Simultaneously X’s value is likely to reduce in the future because they have paid more than they should have. You are therefore long on Y and short on X.
Types of derivatives:
Futures
A Futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell an underlying asset at a future date and price that are both set down in the contract.
Futures contracts are standardised, and the counterparty is always the exchange it is traded on- this means, the entities buying or selling the contract do not have contact with the party selling or buying (respectively) the contract. Each party only interacts with the exchange on which the trade is taking place. Because they are exchange traded, the contracts are standardised rather than personalised.
These contracts are also settled daily by the exchange with the involved parties, so if the buying price of the contract increases, the exchange will ask the purchasing party to top up the difference, further discouraging rogue traders. Further, since these contracts are standardised and exchange traded, they are liquid and transparent.
Example: A natural dye trader worried that her crop of marigolds has not yielded enough flowers in time to make the dye for her next shipment due. She decides to purchase a futures contract for a few additional caseloads of fresh marigold petals, thinking that it’s okay if she ends up with more golden dye rather than less of it.
The contract states that two weeks from the date of purchase, the purchaser of the contract will pay the USD 150 for two kilos of fresh marigold petals. Now the farmer is certain that weather her farm produces enough marigold or not, she will have ready to use fresh petals for making her dye.
Let’s assume that on the date of delivery the price of two kilos of fresh marigold petals is USD 140 in the market, then the farmer still has to pay USD 150 for her delivery. And vice versa.
Forward
A Forward contract is similar to a Futures Contract, with the sole difference that these are customised private contracts between two parties rather than exchange traded.
Therefore these are not centrally settled, they are not liquid, and there is a possibility that the counterparty, which is the other trader and not a central exchange, may renounce the contract at any point, leaving the other party hanging.
Example: Morgan and Akanksha enter into a contract with each other to buy and sell 10 crayons of the now discontinued Crayola Daffodil Yellow. These are not available in the market any longer, and Akanksha is the only seller available, so she can decide any terms. This is also a very small quantity of product and an unusual product for the commodity markets. Morgan and Akanksha therefore enter into a Forward contract to accomodate all the unstandardised elements of their exchange.
If either party were to decide to dishonour the contract at any time before the exchange is completed, there would be no penalties exacted upon them, and the contract would fall through.
Options
Options, give people the possibility of doing something in the future. There are two kinds of options: A Put option, and a Call option.
A Put option is the right, but not the obligation (that is, the option), to sell an underlying asset in the future at a certain price which will be decided at the time of the contract.
A call is the right, but not the obligation, to purchase an underlying asset in the future at a certain price which will be decided at the time of the contract.
Example: A restaurant does not know how many tourists the city will host next year. Depending on whether more than expected tourists come, the owners of the restaurant wish to secure their supply of onions for their famous French onion soup. If there are more tourists, there will be more demand for onions, and then their prices will increase- and yet, the restaurant cannot always increase the price of the soup to reflect the increased price of the onions.
To secure their future supply, and to save themselves price uncertainty, they buy the option to buy more onions during tourist season at current prices. Now they are assured that if prices increase, or supply is tight, they will still have access to the produce. In case at the specified time the option can be exercised, the price of onions drops, they can always just buy from the market, and their only loss is a small fee paid to purchase the option, which for the restaurant is a call option.
If the market price of onions is higher than the price they agreed to pay as part of the Call Option they have bought (that is, they bought the option to buy onions), the restaurant can buy at the Call price and save money in comparison to what they would have paid for buying onions off the open market.
If the market price is less than the call price, they can just buy from the market and the only money they lose is the small amount they paid to buy the Call Option.
Example: For a Put Option, think of a scuba diving instructor, whose business is weather dependent, buys the Option to sell his lessons to a cruise shipping company. This is a Put Option, because it is the option to sell. If during the given week, the weather is good, the scuba diving instructor can sell his lessons at a higher price to other tourists and make more money. However if the weather is poor and tourists do not wish to go scuba diving, he can still sell to the cruise ship company.
Swaps
Swaps allow us to exchange cashflows.
Certain types of financial contract result in a stream of cashflows. For example, a debt contract results in a stream of interest income. Parties can agree to swap the interest they will receive (or pay) in the future with each other.
Example: In terms of climate financing, think of a weather dependent business, for example a movie shooting outdoors. The film production house can get into a Swap contract with a financing company. Let’s say the film company requires 20 continuous days of sunshine and warm weather at their location. They can get into a Swap Contract that says they require an average of 10 hours of sunshine daily, and another Swap that says they want an average of 25°C temperature daily for the twenty days of their shoot.
If the weather is different over the time period for which the film producing company bought the derivatives, they will automatically be paid (just by comparing the actual weather to the base index) and can use the money to cover additional costs that were incurred due to the different weather (like it was rainy instead of sunny).
So, a film production company (Party A) and a financial institution (Party B) enter into a weather swap that says that if there is more than 0 cm of rain between June 20 and July 10 at their location, Party B will pay $10,000 per day where there is more than 0 cm of rain to Party A.
Weather Swaps are generally two way contracts, so depending on the contract, perhaps if there are no rain disruptions, the Production Company may pay the financial institution $10,000 x 20 days = $200,000 instead. This depends on the contract they have entered into.
Sources
“Plastic” is the generic name of a large group of materials. Conventional plastics are made from fossil fuels, however there are now an increasing number of bioplastics available. This post will be about fossil plastics.
Plastics are organic polymers- this means that while other molecules may be added to their chemical composition if required (to create different properties), they are always composed of hydrogen and oxygen molecules.1 Polymers are large chain-like molecules formed of smaller molecules called monomers2, which may be natural or synthetic, and their chief quality of interest is that they can link together to form polymers.3 Polymers can be formed of between two and seven monomer units.3
The first synthetic plastic was invented in 1907 and called Bakelite.4 Since then, it is estimated that 8.3–9.2 billion metric tons of plastic were produced between 1950 and 2017, with over 400 million metric tons being produced annually in recent years.5
The Good
These enormous production numbers are because plastics are a highly versatile group of materials, and are used in every industry due to their properties- they are easy to mould, can be strong or flexible as required, are both electrical and thermal insulators, lightweight, durable, chemically stable and many are corrosion resistant. Their invention has been a boon to humanity in a variety of ways, an example of which is their usage in the medical industry, which has revolutionised medicine and allowed it to be accessible to many more people- from basic gloves, to prosthetics, to blood bags, plastics are ubiquitous in medicine and pharmaceuticals.6
Yet the medical industry is ultimately a minuscule consumer of plastic. 436.66 million tonnes (Mt) of plastics were traded in 2022, with final products alone accounting for 111 Mt.7 The vast majority (between 31% and 40%) of plastics are used today to package products, followed by the construction industry at ~17%, the automotive sector accounts for ~9-18% of global plastic, followed by household and consumer products which take up ~13% of the plastic produced, and electrical and electronic products with ~9%. The residual plastic, which comes to less than 10% of the total production, is used in a variety of sectors, including medical equipment, road signs, etc.7 8 9
| S. No. | Name | You’ve Used This In |
| 1 | Polyethylene (PE or LDPE)10 | Plastic bags, cling film for food storage, extrusion coatings, insulation for wires, etc. |
| Medium-Density Polyethylene (MDPE)11 12 | Shrink wraps, storage tanks, road blocks, traffic cones, fuel tanks, etc. | |
| 2 | High-density polyethylene (HDPE)10 | Pipes, construction material, insulation, plastic bottles, containers, containers for chemical preparations like shampoos and medical supplies, toys, geomembranes, fuel tanks, and swimming pool equipment are some uses. |
| 3 | Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE)13 | Shopping bags, dustbin liners, bubble wrap, stretch and, shrink wrap, plant pots, pipes and tubing, fluid reservoirs, automotive consoles, toys, kayaks, paddleboards, detergent containers, etc. |
| 4 | Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE)10 | Pipes, valves, bulletproof material, aircraft and spacecraft components, battery separators, sail cloths, helmets, Conveyor belts, etc. |
| 5 | Polypropylene (PP)15 16 | Food containers, bottles, plastic bags, car parts such as dashboards or bumpers, disposable syringes, surgical tools, non woven fabrics, fibre and textiles, battery cases, wire insulation, pipes, roofing material, outdoor furniture, etc. |
| 6 | Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)17 | Pipes, credit cards, IV bags, windows, clamshell and other types of packaging, rain wear, shower curtains, etc. |
| 7 | Polystyrene (PS)18 | Disposable cutlery, construction material, seat cushions in cars, automotive door panels, CD cases, foam cups, shock lining in helmets, packaging, insulation material, diagnostic tools, laboratory apparatus, and other uses. |
| 8 | Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)19 20 | Beverage bottles, food backaging, clothing and textile, other packaging, disposable cups, photovoltaic parts, gear housing, greenhouses, and other applications. |
| 9 | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)20 | There are more than 6,000 grades of ABS produced today. LEGO bricks, hutomotive parts, household appliances, consumer goods, walking sticks, 3D printing, medical devices, pipes and fittings, sports equipment, etc. |
| 10 | Polyurethane (PU)21 22 | Automotive components such as dashboards, mud flaps, car door panels, etc., footwear, medical materials, insulation, paint, coatings, aerospace components, agricultural products, cutting sticks, gaskets, Diablo rollers, manufacturing industries, mining, quarrying, oil and gas sectors, and other uses. |
| 11 | Polycarbonate (PC)23 | Coffee machines, food processors, automotive headlamp bezel and lenses, hair driers, construction material, surgical instruments, blood reservoirs, protect eye gears, etc. |
| 12 | Polylactic Acid (PLA)24 | This polymer is biodegradable, and degrates into lactic acid. Used in medical implants, food packaging, engineering plastics, drink packaging, disposable cutlery, shrink wrap, 3D printing. |
| 13 | Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG)25 | 3D printing filament, Consumer electronics, automotive parts, construction material, art and other customised products, etc. |
| 14 | Nylon26 | Ropes, automotive parts, workout wear, swimwear, rain protective wear, guitar strings, nets, and many other uses. |
| 15 | Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)27 28 | Shoe soles, foam mats, adhesives, protective padding, solar panels, automotive interiors components like mats and cushions, sports equipment, toys, etc. |
| 16 | Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)29 | Automotive parts, animal identification tags, textile coatings, garments, adhesives, military equipment, conveyor belts, seals, and other uses. |
The global demand for plastics has quadrupled over the past decades7 and the OECD suggests that under the business-as-usual scenario it is projected to triple by 2060, and of this only 12% is likely to be secondary, or recycled plastic.30 The entire plastics market was valued at $712 billion in 2023 and is projected to continue growing, and thus supports millions of jobs at the moment: As of 2023, the U.S. plastics industry directly employed over 1 million people in the United States, with total plastics-related jobs (such as sales, etc. in the U.S. reaching up to 1.55 million.31 In India, the plastics industry comprises over 50,000 processors and employs over 5 million people directly and indirectly32. It’s also good to remember that the industry does not only consist of direct plastics manufacturing and usage, but has also made several other activities possible in other industries which would not otherwise have been possible (the example of the medical industry is discussed above), thus also adding to jobs in those sectors. In totality, it is approximated that there were 7,637,284 people employed in just the Global Plastic Product & Packaging Manufacturing as of 2024.33
The Bad
On the flip side, this gargantuan human appetite for plastics has caused a macro and micro plastic buildup in the planet.34 According to the United Nations, 51 trillion microplastic particles – 500 times more than stars in our galaxy – litter the seas. They go on to say that by 2050, oceans will have more plastic than fish 99% of seabirds alive will consume microplastic if ongoing trends of plastic pollution are not abated35– and microplastics are now increasingly being found inside humans as well.36 37
Plastics are now in our seafood, the air we breathe38, our tap water38, and even in our fetuses37. In fact, a study approximates that the average adult consumes approximately 2,000 microplastics per year simply by consuming salt. But plastics being found in our systems are a new phenomenon, and therefore are poorly studied. We don’t yet know even the short term impacts of being made up, to a small extent, of our plastic- except they may just be contributing to preterm births37, and hundreds of thousands of annual heart disease deaths39. The OECD has stated that plastic leakage to the environment is likely to double to 44 million tonnes (Mt) annually, while the build-up of plastics in aquatic environments will more than triple, and greenhouse gas emissions from the plastics lifecycle will more than double, from 1.8 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Gt CO2e) to 4.3 Gt CO2e further aggravating environmental and human toxicity.30
In 2022, only 2% of plastics produced were made from renewable sources- of the remaining 98%, 44% was derived from coal, 40% from petroleum, 8% from natural gas, 5% from coke and 1% from other sources.7 In 2019, plastic production amounted to 5.3% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that year, or ~2.24 billion mt of carbon dioxide equivalent. Of this, extracting feedstock fossil fuels used accounted for 20% of the 2.24 billion mt, creating monomers for 26%, and refining hydrocarbons and producing other plastic ingredients kick out 29%.40 41 This spotlights the first of plastic’s environmental issues- even though plastics result in lower greenhouse gas emissions throughout their life cycle compared to alternative materials like metals or glass7, as long as they are extracted from mineral fuels, they will continue to have an outsized impact on the planet, because most of their GHG emissions are produced not during their lifecycle as plastics, but well before they come into existence, at the extraction, monomerisation, and refining stages. Upto 70% of the fossil fuel used in plastic creation comes from the raw materials used in production, and not the electricity used in processing them.42 Another way to look at this is that in a 2018 study it was determined that recycled PET, recycled HDPE, and recycled PP consume 79%, 88%, and 88% less total energy respectively than producing virgin PET, HDPE, and PP43– So while plastics live a virtuous life, the physical and chemical processes during their conception, birth, and post mortem are traumatic for our planet and all living beings on it.
In 2024, humans were projected to have generated 220 million tonnes of plastic waste, an increase of 7.11% from 2021.44 in the same year, Greyparrot.ai, detected 40 billion waste objects at 55 facilities across 20 countries in North America, Europe and Asia. They tracked over 35,000 tonnes of recyclable plastics which were not recycled, and also detected clear plastic containers (like thermoform packaging), and over 7 billion flexible film objects.45 The Alliance to End Plastic Waste estimated in 2023 that at least 360 million tonnes of plastic waste are generated annually, and of that 70% remains uncollected, or was improperly disposed off, leading to leaks into the environment, landfill dumping, open burning.46 Researchers have estimated that ~34% of global plastic waste is incinerated, which is emerging as the most practiced method for disposal.7 About 40% of plastic waste is still fed to landfills (a method of disposal found to be shrinking), and only 9% is recycled.7
Incineration is simply the burning of waste matter, also known as Waste-to-energy (WTE), Thermal treatment, Energy-from-waste, or Energy recovery. When burnt, plastic remembers its fossil origins and generates high temperatures. The combustion is often open, without any way to capture the toxins released.47 Without plastic as part of municipal waste, municipal waste management systems have been known to add coal48 to the waste mix to help achieve the kind of temperatures plastic waste achieves when set fire to49. Thus, firstly, municipal waste management plants have an incentive to encourage plastic waste (so they don’t spend on fuel/ they spend less on fuel). Waste incineration is also known to produce carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, metal oxides, and metal vapours, fly ash, bottom ash, dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls, and black carbon.47 48 Contaminants also get into the soil and groundwater and frequently contain additives (such as fillers, plasticizers, flame retardants, colorants, stabilizers, lubricants, foaming agents, antistatic agents, and metals, including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, cobalt, tin, and zinc), in addition to adhesives and coatings.47 In 2019 CIEL estimated that just burning plastic packaging in the open releases 2.9 Mt CO2e of greenhouse gases into air per ton of plastic packaging50. Further, the open burning of plastics is associated with an increased risk of heart disease, respiratory issues, neurological disorders, nausea, skin rashes, numbness or tingling in the fingers, headaches, memory loss, confusion, cancer and birth defects.47
The second method of plastic disposal mentioned are landfills. A landfill is an ecological system, where the inputs are solid waste and water, and the outputs are leachate (The liquid produced when water percolates through any permeable material) and gas produced by the joint action of biological, chemical, and physical processes. Leachate Recycling landfills are designed to capture and recycle aqueous leachate to prevent or reduce the environmental leakage of potentially harmful waste or degradation residues. Controlled Contaminant Release landfills allow the leachate to migrate to the environment under monitored conditions to prevent harmful events. Unrestricted Contaminant Release landfills, which are older waste dumps, have no controls on leachate or environmental contamination.51 There is no method of knowing what is ultimately happening inside landfills, however, due to the fluctuating temperatures (reaching as high as 60 to 90 °C) and pH (4.5–9), deep-seated fires, physical stress, and compaction, as well as limited microbial activity, landfilled microplastics are likely to continue to fragment into nanoplastics. While most polymers and plastics remain unchanged in landfills, some may degrade into further fragments or biodegrade to water and either are carbon dioxide in aerobic environments or a mixture of carbon dioxide, methane, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in an anaerobic environment.51
This brings us to our third plastic problem- plastic exists everywhere, including places it shouldn’t be in. Plastic litter is categorised as macroplastics (those bits of plastic detritus which are larger than 5 mm), microplastics (the infamous plastic discard sibling, coming in at <5 mm), and nanoplastics (ultrafine particles <100 nm).52 Macroplastics made up 88% of the global plastic waste in 2019, tallying up to ~20 million metric tons in that year. This is the plastic that breaks down into smaller bits due to physical and chemical processes- such as incineration, leaks from landfills, interations with biotic and abiotic forces, etc.52 53
The Solutions
In order of what I think will have the quickest impact/ be the easiest to do:
1. Clean up macro plastic waste, and fine littering.
2. Mandating superior waste sorting, so that recyclable plastics are removed from being incinerator or landfill food. This will require more than just regulation- waste segregators, whether human or AI, will have to be taught how to identify recyclable plastics, which at the moment are PET, HDPE, PP, LDPE, and PVC, with varying levels of ease54 55 56 ,and the number of recycling facilities will have to be increased around the world for all kinds of plastics.
3. Ban (or tax) single use plastics, including those that cannot be recycled (in theory all plastics can be recycled).
4. Investment in and policies to encourage biodegradable plastics.
5. Reduce consumption. Of course this will require a cultural shift, and goes against our general capitalist consumerist values, but less consumption leads to less plastic used for making, packaging, transporting, installing, using, and disposing off the product.
6. Have some compassion- plastics have made all our lives better, but especially so for disadvantaged people. This mess was created over a century, so we can take a few years to sort it out without demonising or causing problems to those who need help the most.57 58 59 60
Sources:
Climate change adaptation finance is the gangplank between addressing constantly escalating climate threats, and our current level of climate adversity preparedness- that is, it is used to help adjust to the adverse effects of climate change, such as floods, fires, or other extreme weather events.
The UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report 2024 states that while it remains technically possible to get on a 1.5°C pathway, a failure to deliver superior results would put the world on course for a temperature increase of 2.6-3.1°C over the course of this century.1 To achieve the pathway to limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C, the current estimates are that the annual adaptation finance gap is US$187-359 billion per year2, and developed countries, that did most of the climate damage must double adaptation finance to at least $40 billion a year by 20253.
In 2022, the total financial flows to adaptation efforts were assessed to be $32.4 billion4, while another approximation puts this value at $63 billion5, which is nearly twice the first estimate- and yet, to put our requirements into further perspective, the all nations at COP29 agreed that the all sources of finances should generate $1.3 trillion annually by 2035, less than 10 years from now6.
Various financial mechanisms and instruments have been devised to address the gap. Here is a brief run down of some interesting ones:
1. Results based finance/ Outcome-Based Instruments- Money is paid out only once the previously agreed results are achieved. Debt-for-climate swaps/ Debt-for-Nature Swaps- “In a debt-for-adaptation swap, countries who borrowed money from other nations or multilateral development banks (e.g., the IMF and World Bank) could have that debt forgiven, if the money that was to be spent on repayment was instead diverted to climate adaptation and resilience projects.”7 These are a type of Results Based Financing.
2. Blended finance- The use of cataclytic finance to increase private sector participation in climate financing.8 Catalytic capital—debt, equity, guarantees, and other investments that accept disproportionate risk or concessionary returns compared to a conventional investment in order to generate positive impact.9 For example, guarantees are an assurance by a party that they will bear all losses for a project in case any occur, so that other investors come in to finance the project. Pooled investments are another example of blended finance, where capital from different entities is combined to finance projects.8
3. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES)- The beneficiaries of ecosystem services remunerate those who tend to the ecosystem in question. A hypothetical example is paying the tribespeople who live in and tend to the Amazonian forests for providing a green lung to the rest of the world.
4. Liquidity facilities- Providing loans at the time of a crisis, often at concessional rates, or deferring repayments of old debts after an extreme weather event so that the nation(s) suffering from it have adequate liquidity to help their citizens.
5. Bonds- A bond is a debt instrument which offers an interest rate in exchange for lending money to the issuer of the bond. When the issuer is a sovereign, the interest rates are usually low since it is believed that they can cover at least the nominal value of the interest and the basic capital borrowed, whereas riskier debts such as corporations must offer more attractive rates of interest.
Catastrophe bonds are bonds issued to investors by insurers or pension funds which are offered at attractive rates and cover the risk of a climate catastrophe. In case such an event occurs, these funds are called in, however in case no such disaster happens, the investors benefit from the high interest rates.
There are also a variety of sustainable bonds, such as green bonds, sustainability-linked bonds, blue bonds, etc. and are used to fund different types of climate projects.
6. Green securitisation- Securitisation is the practice of clumping various financial instruments with similar characteristics together to form a completely new instrument which can then be sold to those willing to accept the risks and rewards associated with that new instrument, and the underlying securities. If the underlying securities were originally issued for climate friendly projects, they are called “Green Securitisation”.10
These and other mechanisms are all geared towards luring private funds into covering the gaping mouth of climate change adaptation requirements. Its clear that the need is dire, however these and other climate related mechanisms still form a tine part of the global capital markets.
Sources
Biomimicry is the process of imitating nature to achieve solutions for human problems. An example is imitating the structure of a bird’s body to create aeroplanes, thus reducing drag, noise pollution, and fuel consumption while the plane is flying. Such designs are slowly proliferating across the world in the form of material design (think velcro)1, product design (solar cells)1, and architectural design (The Water Cube, also known as the National Aquatics Centre in Beijing, China)2.
Biomimetic designs have several advantages:
1. Resource efficiency- Biomimicry encourages resource efficiency, so that fewer materials are used, and less waste generated when such design principles are used- termite mounds used as a model for buildings, since they are naturally cooler, have led to a smaller energy footprint due to lower cooling requirement, and copying whale fins have allowed wind turbines to be upgraded to greater efficiency.2
2. Resilience- Since it is a copy of a naturally efficient design, such products or spaces are congenitally resilient and not prone to breakage or damage.
3. Regeneration- Nature is regenerative, and thus nature-inspired design is too. Harvesting rainwater can help replenish groundwater resources. Other examples include public food gardens, public green spaces, green walls, restoring damaged landscapes, etc.
4. Cradle to Cradle- Designers can aim for long product lives, scientists for increased material stability, manufacturers can take back old products and remanufacture, and governments can legislate the right to repair, as well as connecting industries as much as possible so that where possible waste from one industry may be used as raw material for another, whenever virgin material is not a requirement due to health or other concerns.
5. Innovative- biomimetic designs spur technology, human comfort, and positive environmental outcomes to newer heights. Examples include the development of super hydrophobic material inspired by lotus leaves, synthetic spider silk, antimicrobial medical devices, and many more.2
Biomimicry uses design that have been perfected over billions of years of evolution to adapt to and take advantage of the environment in which they function, and offers real world scalable solutions can address sustainable development goals. Studying and replicating these designs allows us to benefit from evolutionary specialisation and live in closer harmony with our own environment. However, there are several challenges in commercialising such designs:
1. Scalability- biology is complex and organisms are a intricate interweaving of multilayered interactions between different compounds such as proteins, lipids, muscle cells, immune systems, nervous systems, defence mechanisms, etc. producing such material is difficult in labs, let alone at scale.
2. Education- Biomimicry is not studied or taught at most schools and its principles are not well known. This limits the number of people who are able to access the knowledge of how to imitate natural beings to the few who are already interested or conversant with the matter.
3. Interdisciplinenary nature-biomimicry requires interdisciplinary cooperation. Since different professions often don’t work together unless brought together for a specific project, opportunities to create biomimic outcomes are limited unless that is the specific project aim.
4. Material stability- biological material often cannot survive outside of an organism, so creating a similar compound, or a synthetic compound that mimics it is problematic and economically unviable due to their short lifespans or inability of synthetics to perform at the same level as the biotic compounds.
5. Experimental- Such projects are uncertain by nature. There is no guarantee that the creators who set out to make a particular solution will be able to do so. There is therefore no standard business model.
6. Limited inspiration- few organisms have been studied deeply enough for humans to be able to replicate their biology and processes. Currently, it is approximated that research has focused on a mere 20 organisms.3
7. Geometry- biological molecules are incredibly small. Human labs can often not replicate the chemistry of these compounds and layers at such scales.
8. Costs- due to all the above factors, plus a lack of policy support, financing such projects is often an uphill battle.
Overcoming these challenges will require vision, time, policy support, and financing, but the returns on investment will be abundant for society, science, and sustainable development.
Sources
In this part of the series of posts on a just energy transition, I’ll explore what an energy transition is, and why we must achieve it.
Energy transition is simply the switch our current dependence on fossil fuels to renewable or low carbon sources for energy production. This is essential because climate change is being fueled by our dependence on mineral fuels- the use of which release greenhouse gases into our atmosphere.
Greenhouse gases are gases that trap the Sun’s heat in our atmosphere, leading to a long term warming of our planet, causing local and global weather changes that living beings on the planet did not evolve with, and also causing abiotic planetary forces to react in ways that harm life and infrastructure- for example, warmer oceans lead to more hurricanes, causing greater property damage and loss of human, animal, and plant lives.
Since these gases collect in the atmosphere, there is a build up of heat absorbing chemicals in the air over time. Carbon Dioxide in particular persists in the atmosphere fore thousands of years, which means that the CO2 released into the atmosphere by, for example, burning coal to fire steam engines during the industrial revolution, is still blanketing us today. Other gases issued due to the combustion of fossils have shorter lifespans, but greater warming effects due to the structure of their molecules- although methane (CH4) on average lasts in the atmosphere for less than 12 years, it’s 100 year warming potential can be between 28 to 36 times as potent as CO2, for example1.
Just like if the planet were to cool (and continue cooling) overmuch, a planet that is heating up is catastrophic to life and property.
In comparison, non fossil sources of energy are considered clean fuels, since they do not liberate the greenhouse gas genie into our atmosphere while operating to produce energy. Please do note that while they contribute negligible amounts to global warming while making electricity, they do contribute to it through their supply chains- that is, scope 2 and 3 emissions.
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) reviewed nearly 3,000 published life cycle assessment studies on utility-scale electricity generation
from wind, solar photovoltaics, concentrating solar power, biopower, geothermal, ocean energy, hydropower, nuclear, natural gas, and coal technologies, as well as lithium-ion battery, pumped storage hydropower, and hydrogen storage technologies, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from various sources of energy to inform policy, planning, and investment decisions. Less than 15% of the studies passed the various quality and relevance checks. On studying the ones that did pass these checks, NREL came to the conclusion that the Median Published Life Cycle Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation Technologies was as follows2:
| S. No. | Type of Technology | Generation Technology | Median Published Life Cycle Emissions Factors |
| 1. | Renewable | Biomass | 52 |
| 2. | Renewable | Photovoltaica | 43 |
| 3. | Renewable | Concentrating Solar Powerb | 28 |
| 4. | Renewable | Geothermal | 37 |
| 5. | Renewable | Hydropower | 21 |
| 6. | Renewable | Ocean | 8 |
| 7. | Renewable | Windc | 13 |
| 8. | Storage | Pumped Storage Hydropower | 7.4 |
| 9. | Storage | Lithium-ion Battery | 33 |
| 10. | Storage | Hydrogen Fuel Cell | 38 |
| 11. | Non Renewable | Nucleard | 13 |
| 12. | Non Renewable | Natural Gas | 486 |
| 13. | Non Renewable | Oil | 840 |
| 14. | Non Renewable | Coal | 1001 |
As can be seen in the table above, the median Emission Factor (Emission Factors are a way to understand how much GHG emissions were released due to a particular activity) for the total lifecycle Non Renewables are far greater than those of either storage or renewable technologies. These emissions are primarily released during the combustion phase for the Non Renewables, however non of the other technologies require combustion to create electricity (and neither does Nuclear Light-Water Reactor technology, resulting in the very low Median Lifecycle EF).
Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions grew by 51% from 1990 to 2021, and more than 75% of these emissions come from the energy sector.3 Thus it’s obvious that by switching over to sources of energy that are not carbon intensive, we will be able to target the most conspicuous source of planet warming emissions. Shifting out of non renewable sources of energy will also reduce our dependence on fossils, and diversify our energy mix and enhance global energy security (in 2022 fossil fuels provided 81% of the total energy supply globally4), improve global health outcomes by reducing pollution, and finally- also improve the climate outlook.
Sources
It is known even now the world will go through extreme climate events that cannot be avoided. Such events, caused by human activities indirectly trapping heat in our planet’s atmosphere which has already resulted in an increase of nearly 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.1 degrees Celsius) between 1850-19001, are likely to include more wildfires, more floods, more hurricanes, more droughts, more heatwaves, different precipitation patterns,2 seasonal changes that happen at different times than a century, or even just a couple of decades ago among other negative outcomes. Weather events are also expected to be more intense than earlier ones- that is, there will be more incidence of hotter heatwaves, hurricanes on the higher side of the scale, more intense precipitation, etc.
While many of these adverse impacts cannot be avoided any longer, we can prevent an exacerbation of these outcomes by shifting to a lower carbon economic system than what we have now. This shift from carbon intensive economic activities to an economy that is either carbon neutral (net zero) or negative is referred to as climate transition.
Our global economy is heavily reliant on mineral fuels- currently two-thirds of our fuel demand is met through fossil fuels3. In the Global Energy Review 2025, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated that the carbon intensity of global economic activity is the product of the energy intensity of GDP and the carbon intensity of total energy supply.4 That is, we first find out how much energy it takes to produce the entire world’s Gross Domestic Product, and then multiply it with the amount of carbon produced to make that much energy. This means we can slow down carbon emissions in two ways- reduce our production and consumption activities, or make sure it takes less energy to keep them at the same level they are today.
In 2019, heat and electricity production cost us 34% of the global greenhouse gas production, industry accounted for 24%, transportation 15%, and buildings 6% of the global greenhouse gas emissions in that year. It may be noted that 95% of the transportation sector runs on fossil fuels.5 And, in 2024, the CO2 intensity per unit of economic activity was lower than the average improvement seen over the previous decade.4 So not only are we using a lot of energy to support our lifestyles, we are also failing to decrease the amount of greenhouse gases that are released into the atmosphere due to these activities.
It is clear that the change to a lower carbon economy is emergent, must be large scale, and involve every sector and industry in the global economy, including the labour markets, and therefore the communities those workers belong to. It’s a systemic shift that will affect all living beings on our planet, and cause significant human distress unless it is planned and executed with careful compassion.
“The scientific evidence is unequivocal: climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and the health of the planet. Any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future,”
– IPCC Working Group II Co-Chair, Hans-Otto Pörtner3
Given the above, energy transition is a formidable task ahead of our species. A just transition, which distributes an equitable burden for the resources required to finance the transition among those who are wealthy and those who are not, is going to be even more challenging.
Accelerating climate actions and progress towards a just transition is essential to reducing climate risks and addressing sustainable development priorities, including water, food and human security.
-IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change7
The consequences of climate change affect people disproportionately- the impoverished suffer much more than those who have the resources to avoid the results of the adverse fallout of climate change. Climate change energy transitions are also going to have widespread consequences. A “just” climate transition is one where the economic burden of the transition falls on people in the proportion in which they contributed to climate change- this means that the wealthy with extravagant lifestyles bear more responsibility, and cost, for the shift to a carbon neutral or negative economy than workers who are living within a system they did not create. This also means countries which industrialised in the 1800s must answer for the greenhouse gases they pumped into the atmosphere to achieve their prosperity, and that most corporations bear greater responsibilities than most individuals.
In this series of posts, I’ll explore what the energy transition will require, how we may go about achieving it, and what we must do for the transition to be just.
Sources
Industrial decarbonisation refers to the transition of the industrial sector from the use of fossil fuels to less carbon intensive sources of fuel, as well as for their processes to release fewer greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. This will help minimise the impact of the industrial sector on our planet and reduce negative externalities. An externality is a positive or negative consequence of an action that affects someone without affecting the person who did the original action. In this case, pollution caused by industries negatively impacts planetary warming, health outcomes, biodiversity, etc. causing poor outcomes and imposing costs on people and other living beings. Externalities are not reflected in costs to the entity that executed the original act, but either benefit or impose costs on bystanders.
Industries emitted 4.1 GtCO2-eq or 24% of global emissions in 2019. This figure does not take emissions from their use of power and heat, which raises the figure to 20 GtCO2-eq or 34%. However, direct fuel use emissions from industrial activities were found to have decreased to 7 GtCO2-eq, 50% of direct industrial emissions (of the 4.1 GtCO2-eq) in 2019.1
The authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 6th assessment report had high confidence that “Net zero CO2 emissions from the industrial sector are possible but challenging”, and stated that while energy efficiency will continue to be important, switching production to less energy intensive processes is vital. The report further states that industrial emissions have been growing faster since 2000 than emissions in any other sector, driven by increased basic materials (raw material, such as those extracted through mining or forestry, etc. used in the industrial sector) extraction and production1
Innovation and accounting are the backbones of decarbonisation, and any sustainability strategy, here are some available to those wish to pursue decarbonisation:
i. Energy efficiency – Reducing energy consumption reduces emissions, and happily, reduces production costs.
ii. Using low carbon energy sources – Using clean energy sources for all or part of the production process, such as equipment powered by electricity rather than traditional fuels (think gas burners vs. induction stove tops- the latter removes fossil fuel from the equation, except for what is used at source to produce the electricity).
iii. Greater supply chain accountability – While addressing Scope 3 emissions are egregiously challenging, organisations taking care of their S1 and S2 emissions while working with their supply chain partners to address their S1 and S2 emissions will help minimise S3 for the entire chain.
iv. Targeting Scope 4 – Any industrial decarbonisation strategy must embrace innovating to increase S4 emissions, which are emissions avoided that would otherwise have been made if the current prevalent technology, was used. For example, if a motion triggered lighting system in hospital corridors is more energy efficient than one which is left switched on the entire time. The emissions avoided due to the development and use of motion sensing lights are an example of S4 emissions. Work from home, or using video conferencing technology instead of working daily from office, or traveling for meetings are other contemporary examples.
v. Reducing energy losses – According to the USEIA, more than 60% energy is lost to conversion.3 When fuel is burnt for producing heat, which is then used indirectly to produce electricity- for example, burning coal (level 1 – stored chemical energy to thermal energy) to heat water to produce steam (level 2 – thermal energy used to change the state of water from liquid to gas) to power turbines (level 3 – thermal energy to mechanical energy) to run a generator rotor to produce electricity (level 4 – Mechanical energy to electricity) – energy is lost to various inefficiencies such as incomplete chemical conversion of the raw material to heat, friction, heat loss, transition losses, electrical losses, and so on. These losses are significantly reduced when renewable energy is used to power turbines, but grid dependent industries will receive their electricity after transmission and distribution (T&D) losses.
Industries can help address this by using better captive technologies such as Trigeneration, also known as Combined Heating Cooling and power (CHPC), which uses natural gas as a fuel source (I know) to produce electricity, and uses the waste heat to produce heating (say for heating buildings or for process heating) and refrigeration (through vapor absorption refrigeration systems) as required. Of course, this way the organisation will have greater control over its power source, and low grid-dependence- and no T&D losses.
v. Using artificial intelligence – artificial intelligence can identify redundancies in our systems, and find where and how we can reduce emissions through our industrial supply chains. Whether the suggestions are usable or not is for humans to decide once the computers have done their work.
Lastly, I’ve seen a lot of content advocating for Carbon Capture and related technologies/ processes, but I don’t quite understand them yet, and I do think abatement is better than storage. Also trees already do capture and use carbon, and perhaps we can just increase the global natural forest coverage.
I’d love to go into industry specific strategies in further posts, so stay tuned for those posts.
Sources:
2. World Bank data on global T&D losses, 2014
3. More than 60% of energy used for electricity generation is lost in conversion